Active Dataguard vs. regular Dataguard performance- 11gR1

From: "Crisler, Jon" <Jon.Crisler@xxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:15:30 -0400

Are there any performance implications for Active Dataguard (DG)
compared to standard DG?  I am thinking primarily in the areas of
transport time and bandwidth, and somewhat in disk i/o.  Thanks in
advance.

References:
- Re: Anyone using Ruby for scripting?
  - From: David Mann
- Re: Anyone using Ruby for scripting?
  - From: Connor McDonald

Other related posts:

» Active Dataguard vs. regular Dataguard performance- 11gR1 - Crisler, Jon