Re: ASM Risk / Rewards

  • From: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ag@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:20:53 +0100

ASM is a requirement for SE RAC. Consequently any SE RAC customers on
windows will be using ASM. When I was working for them the CPA applications
for the Audit Commission (http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/cpa/index.asp)
were hosted on just such a RAC database, though that may have changed since.


ASM worked just fine - this would have been 10.1.0.2 or 10.1.0.3 from memory
- so even relatively early ASM was pretty good. I wouldn't personally have
gone with ASM at that early stage if I'd had a choice, so take my comments
above as an endorsement.

As far as popularity of the platform goes, last I saw Windows users
accounted for about 30-40% of Oracle's DBMS customers (by number not value).
It wouldn't suprise me at all if windows+asm is rather more prevalent than
(say) hpux+asm.

cheers

Niall

On 8/31/07, Alex Gorbachev <ag@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Oracle on Windows... well this is more of a religious topic and I'm a
> bit religious here even though I happen to administer few Windows
> environments. :-)
>
> I don't have any experience with ASM on Windows (I wouldn't even think
> that it works but apparently it supposed to). I also don't know anyone
> using ASM on Windows from which I can conclude that relying on storage
> stack that very few Oracle customers use is a recipe for disaster.
>
> Now if I add RAC there... Hm.. some people travel god knows where to
> find some exotic adventures but here is an excellent opportunity! ;-)
>
> Windows + Oracle + RAC + ASM = WORA (what a fun project)   %)
>
> PS: Sorry for being a little sarcastic but I couldn't resist!
>
> >  From: steve montgomerie [mailto:stmontgo@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2007 11:00 PM
> > To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: ASM Risk / Rewards
> >
> >
> > Good day,
> > We're doing the PeopleSoft upgrade thing which includes an upgrade from
> > Oracle 9i to 10G Rel2.
> >
> > Our environment will be Windows 2003 with RAC 10G.
> >
> > As part of the upgrade I see from the Oracle Docs that Oracle recommends
> > using ASM. I've been reading researching and testing
> > on a smaller machine getting read for the new hardware.
>
>
> --
> Alex Gorbachev, Oracle DBA Brewer, The Pythian Group
> http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alex http://www.oracloid.com
> BAAG party - www.BattleAgainstAnyGuess.com
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>


-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

Other related posts: