[optimal] Re: Montage/Photo Stitching Programs
- From: Jef Jodell <mpscra@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 15:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Hi all,
On this topic I must say I find the Imagenet (mosaic) works great, or not at
all. You can however move the images to the proper spot with Imagenet which is
a plus for that system. Topcon seems to show the differences more than other
makes though, when it comes to the changes inherent in concave images shot from
different angles.
OIS (montage) does a very good, reliable job overall. Occassionally there is
some vessels that "break" where they meet. I also think the earlier version did
a slightly better job than the newest version.
Lately I have gotten a real surprise though. Started using MRP again, but now
with the full size sensors such as OIS use, and must say I have seen truly
completely artifact freeimages using what they call "mapping". Still not my
fave capture software, but that feature looks great!
Still, nothing beats photoshop...
--- On Thu, 9/1/11, Hess, Ditte <dhess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Hess, Ditte <dhess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [optimal] Re: Montage/Photo Stitching Programs
To: "'optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2011, 7:27 AM
Bob, Marcela uses the Topcon ImageNet software and I use the OIS software –
so that’s probably not what you were looking for ?? Ditte Ditte J. Hess,
CRADir. of Photographic Educational &Research Training ProgramsBascom Palmer
Eye Institute900 NW 17th StreetMiami, FL 33136Phone (305) 326-6000 x6280EMail
dhess@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bascompalmer.orgThe information contained in
this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is
intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message. P please consider the
environment - do you really need to print this email? From:
optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cavicchi, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:34 PM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Re: Montage/Photo Stitching Programs Hopefully one/both of
them will see this and make some suggestions. Thanks Mike. bob From:
optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Michael P Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:27 PM
To: optimal
Subject: [optimal] Re: Montage/Photo Stitching Programs Contact Ditte and/or
Marcella. They will be giving a talk in this subject at the Chapel Hill 2012
Mid-Year on June 9-10.
Sent from my Blackberry Storm. From: "Cavicchi, Robert"
[Robert.Cavicchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 08/31/2011 04:21 PM AST
To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [optimal] Re: Montage/Photo Stitching Programs Denice, Just looked
it up and you are correct, Leslie McKeen did win for this at last year’s
Scientific Session. But, unfortunately, no of the programs were named in the
abstract submission.Maybe Leslie will see this and offer some insight (pun
intended). bob From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic
Center
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:16 PM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Re: Montage/Photo Stitching Programs Didn’t Leslie win best
SS presentation last year for this very thing? Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT,
ROUB, CDOS, FOPSOphthalmic Diagnostic CenterCPMC Department of
Ophthalmology2100 Webster Street Suite 212San Francisco CA 94115(415)
600-3937 FAX (415) 600-6563 From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cavicchi, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:07 PM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Montage/Photo Stitching Programs Fellow Optimalers,
Looking for personal experiences and/or recommendations for commercially
available software programs.I know that most, if not all, of the digital
imaging systems include some rudimentary versions of these in their proprietary
SW programs but need something independent. Thanks in advance. bob
Other related posts:
