On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 02:31 +0530, Prashant Desai wrote: > I have read that VC1 which is just subset of wm9 deliver the same quality > video at approx half of the rate at which the mpeg-4 avc delivers the same > video with same quality I'd call that statement a bold-faced lie. :-) > I personally have never seen the quality of video for any of these MPEG-4 > AVC or wm9 or VC1 on a TV set at same rate ...... See below. > Are there any test results that been published by an independent entity for > these ? If there is please point me to it, since we really in dilemma > whether to go with mpeg-4 AVC or with VC1 or with proprietary wm9? My personal suggestion would be AVC because you don't end up with vendor lock-in. Check the forum section on www.doom9.org section 'new codecs'. You'll find a number of comparison tests on encoded material. Nero Digital pretty much has the best H.264 codec implementation on PCs today. x264 will be the solution to use for cross-platform Linux/BSD/Windows implementations - it is moving along rapidly. Cheers Kon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.