What exactly do you mean by "fully conformant"? That an MPEG-2 decoder should be able to decode /any/ resolution (for example 592x480 in MP@ML) within the level it's built for? I don't believe there's a hardware decoder on the planet that can do that. Nobody in their right mind is going to put all the required multi-tap upsampling filters into their design to accomplish that. Or do you mean the de facto standard horizontal resolutions of 352, 480, (528 for cable), 544, 640, 704, 720 for SD and 1280, 1440 and 1920 for HD? I don't know where the de facto horizontal resolutions came from. Certainly not MPEG-2. I'll make a WAG and say that DirecTV played the biggest part in selecting the SD resolutions. Ron Tom McMahon wrote: >MPEG puts teeth into nothing; it has never done so, and it will never do so >(nor does it have anything whatsoever to do with >licensing terms, by the way). > >It was up to the ATSC to voluntarily conform to the full MPEG-2 specification; >they choose not to do so (which as you point out was >bad form on ATSC's part). By selecting a subset, they suffer the consequences >in a world where others have chosen to be fully >conformant, and MPEG-2 bitstreams cross DTV domain boundaries increasingly >easily. > >-----Original Message----- >From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf Of Craig Birkmaier >Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 7:55 AM > >... > >Conformance to the MPEG-2 standard would have been the best approach, but MPEG >did not put any teeth into conformance. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.