[ola] Re: Evaluating student output using MEPNI
- From: "Young, Lisa" <lyoung@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "ola@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ola@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnold Bleicher <arnoldb@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:52:05 +0000
Thank you Jody, This is helpful!
From: ola-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ola-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jody Soberon
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 7:52 AM
To: ola@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Arnold Bleicher
Subject: [ola] Evaluating student output using MEPNI
Good morning,
I am working on a grading rubric which my principal is requiring in order to
assess Spanish 1 students with their abilities. Once this one makes sense and
passes inspection, I will do the Spanish 2 Rubric. Since we are Standards and
Proficiency based, I am using both the ACTFL guidelines and the Oregon State
Standards as well as Arnold's email on evaluating comprehensibility of student
output. I am putting this out for all, and not just Arnold because I know there
are others out there trying to figure out how to grade students on this new
MEPNI model and can benefit from output by others already using the model.
I found a rubric out from another school district to use as a guideline; it was
much more basic and wasn't using all ACTFL language though it was based on the
ACTFL guidelines. I am hoping that I am at least on the right track for the
changes and additions I have made to better assess where students are moving
and to help me look for evidence of what they can do with their performance. At
the moment, this is all I have and is better than nothing, but I am truly
looking forward to input from the experts.
Have a wonderful day,
Jody Soberon
P.S. In case there is anyone out there not familiar with MEPNI:
Mastery
Exceeds
Proficiency
Not Proficient
Insufficient evidence
Close to ABCDF, except N and I receive no credit and there are no other
sublevel grades + or -.
Foreign Languages
Brookings Harbor High School
Other related posts:
