I want to back off a bit on this identification….Hopefully the photos will be available soon. I have only seen Owen's photo. If it isn't a Ross' Gull I don't know what it is, and the photo is rather good. Sorry for the premature post. maybe it is even something less expected… Jeff Gilligan On Sep 25, 2014, at 1:06 AM, Jeff Gilligan <jeffgilligan10@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In addition to the birds reported by Judy, it turns out that an adult Ross' > Gull was also seen on the pelagic trip, about 50 miles off Tillamook County. > The Ross' Gull was not close to the ship, but the blow up of the pixels of > the photographs taken by Owen Schmidt and Tom Crabtree are distinctive. > > Many (probably all) saw the gull, but after someone had called out Sabine's > Gull, which was quickly dismissed when it became apparent that the upper > wings were plain pale gray, and it was assumed to be an Arctic Tern that > somehow looked a little off. (I only got my binoculars on the rather distant > gull, and I do't know that anyone who was not photographing it really got a > good look at it. The guys who were photographing it of course couldn't study > the field marks when taking photos even and it been closer.) Fortunately the > photos show the bird better than many or any of us saw the bird. I am sure > Owen and Tom will make photos available soon on OBOL. > > Roos' Gull was not something that any of us who I have talked with expected > to see on a pelagic trip. > > Jeff Gilligan > > > > > OBOL archives: www.freelists.org/archive/obol Manage your account or unsubscribe: //www.freelists.org/list/obol Contact moderators: obol-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx