Does anyone have an update on this? Sent from my iPad > On Jul 23, 2014, at 10:53, "David Bailey" <davidcbaileyoregon@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Wednesday 23 July 2014 > Tillamook County, Oregon > Nehalem Sewage Ponds > NE pond along the North rock-edged shore > > In the company of adult Pectoral Sandpipers (three) and in direct comparison > to at least one that was less than a foot away was a dull-yellow-legged > Calidrid in adult plumage with a very obvious pale base to the bill, a > strikingly (given how many Least Sandpipers on which I have looked for this > trait over the years) obvious dark cap that seamlessly met the upper > mandible, pale whitish supercillium widening behind the eye, obvious white > eye-ring, coverts and tertials collectively making a paler panel of plumage > compared to the darker scapulars and mantle, and to top it all off the bird > had that upright and long-necked stance that, of course Least perform when > startled or alert (and frequently enough that it is not a diagnostic field > mark), but this bird kept this stance throughout and looked pretty odd for > doing so, very much more like a Sharp-tailed or Pectoral Sandpiper than a > Least. Perhaps because of this, or other structural nuances, the stint > appeared to be about 2/3 the size of the adjacent Pectoral Sandpiper--giving > the impression of being more the size of a Western Sandpiper than a Least. > The plumage of the bird was overall worn and not showing much color, though I > was viewing it under overcast skies and through light rain. The birds flew > off and all I heard were the obvious calls of Pectoral Sandpipers and perhaps > a call from the peep, but I heard no sounds typical of Least Sandpiper. I did > not see the toes well enough on the standing bird (due to my viewing angle) > or in flight to assess their relative lengths. The Tarsus did appear long on > the standing bird and probably contributed to the impression that the bird > was much larger than a typical Least Sandpiper. > > To be sure, I am not trying to start any sort of Asian stint fever, and were > my observations in sum to come to me as a member of the Oregon Birds Records > Committee, of which I am a former member, I would vote to not accept this > record due to the fact that all these field marks are supportive and subtle > with nothing solid to hang my hat on so to speak. I made a personal promise > to myself long ago to be sure to avoid being stringy when it comes to > identification, especially when it came to small sandpipers in the genus > Calidris, and especially so with Long-toed Stint, I can say without > hesitation that the peep/stint I saw this morning at the Nehalem Sewage Ponds > so stood out given the marks I have listed that I feel it warrants an RBA on > the chance that others can get out there today or tomorrow to photo-document > this potential (and I saw that with emphasis again, "potential") mega-rarity > for our region. At the risk of being redundant let me restate that Long-toed > stint makes for an exceedingly difficult identification and that the bird of > interest I saw today was in worn adult plumage. > > I think it likely that the bird may be hanging around the ponds as the three > PECTORAL SANDPIPERS are staging there assuming that they are the same adults > I noted yesterday and the weather has taken a turn for the worse in regard to > good weather for migrating. In other somewhat be related odd shorebird > migration news three adult RED KNOTS flew a couple circles around the ponds > before heading out to the the NW while I was there with this peep too. > > I Still haven't relocated the Bank Swallow I found there last week. > > > David > > David C. Bailey > Manzanita, Oregon for the summer