I realize that catbird habitat is an anomaly and the least of our problems here on the coast. But it stands for any habitat really and the more people are informed about invasive plants vs. native plants and habitat removal in general, the better, no? A lot of budding birders aren't aware of habitat loss in general and invasives in particular. And I realize it's happening everywhere and I am just one small voice but I insist on defending native habitat! From: Tim Rodenkirk Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:08 PM To: mmcdowell1955@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Nels Nelson ; Wayne Hoffman ; obol Subject: Re: [obol] Re: Loss of Catbird habitat I can't tell you how much habitat has been removed in Coos County, it is crazy, but I think that is the case everywhere. As for catbird habitat being removed? It was such a bizarre event to begin with, but to think that catbirds would breed a second year at the same spot is well crazy too : ) It is always a bummer when good birding habitat disappears. I saw much of that today driving from Bandon to Coquille. The Barred Owl spot along Hwy 42N (that I heard them from Hwy 42S) on the local CBC has been clearcut. Also, there has been a fantastic passerine spot for years at the Norway pond sight near Myrtle Point, Coos. It has been totally leveled with cats. There is no veg anywhere along the east side of the pond and it looks like they may be planning on building something. I can't even begin to talk about all the changes around Coos Bay also. You all may think that we get good birds down here and such (at times) but the reality is that good birding spots are hard to find and mostly they are emphermal locations on lands not protected for any reason. Very frustrating indeed, nothing like what you all have happening in the valley. That said, I couldn't imagine living in a bigger city than Coos Bay! The ups and the downs... Tim R Coos Bay On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:33 AM, melissa <mmcdowell1955@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: As a retired invasive plant manager for a federal agency, it is frustrating that native plants were removed in favor of holly, etc. Thanks are in order for the removal of English ivy and Himalayan blackberry but if in fact a state agency was involved in this vegetation project the agency needs to be questioned. If it happened on private, then yes I agree that landowners should be informed (with much diplomacy). From: Nels Nelson Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 8:46 AM To: Wayne Hoffman Cc: obol Subject: [obol] Re: Loss of Catbird habitat Wayne/all, I'm wondering if this disaster (for the GRCA and all of us birdwatchers that got to see them there) is partly my/our fault for not letting the powers that be at HMSC know of this unique west side GRCA nesting site and it's importance, or was it simply insensitivity or incompetence on the part of someone at HMSC. It's too late for this site (at least in the near future, absent prompt re-plantings of the mature native Salal, Salmonberry, Red Elderberry, and Waxmyrtle), but makes me ponder the importance of developing a protocol within OBA that would trigger someone from OBA informing the landowner of any/all future nesting sites (of this and other rare/semi-rare species) when they are discovered and the negative impact it would have on the species if the landowner should decide to alter that habitat. Just some random thoughts passing through my mind. I'm curious if other OBOLites have similar thoughts or suggestions to consider. Nels Hillsboro On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Wayne Hoffman <whoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi - Earlier this week the patch of shrubbery at the Hatfield Marine Science Center where the Gray Catbirds nested last summer has been cleared. This may have been done as part of an exotics control program. The area did have a lot of English Ivy and Himalayan Blackberry, however the native Salal, Salmonberry, Red Elderberry, and Waxmyrtle were also removed. And, the exotic holly tree and Cherry Laurel were retained. In any case the habitat that housed the only documented catbird nesting west of the Cascades is no longer. Wayne