Hi Noelia, Thanks for your thoughts. Replies inline: On 30/01/2015 1:22 PM, Noelia wrote:
I'm not suggesting that reviewers can't make suggestions and even provide patches if they wish. I'm suggesting it shouldn't be a requirement for reviewers to do this, nor should it be a requirement that these changes be made in order to have the add-on listed. At this point, NV Access isn't bothering to list some potentially useful add-ons on the site (Festival, Newfon, speechPlayerInEspeak, etc.) because the process is just far too onerous. If even we are shying away from using the repository, that is not a good sign.Hi, I think we need improve the add-ons quality as far as possible, and our revision should cover code optimization if we can.
Again, reviewers would still of course be welcome to contribute to others' add-ons and maybe even take over maintaining them. My point is that it should not be a requirement, only something you choose to do.
Thanks, Jamie -- James Teh Executive Director, NV Access Limited Ph +61 7 3149 3306 www.nvaccess.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess SIP: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxx ----------------------------------------------------------------NVDA add-ons: A list to discuss add-on code enhancements and for reporting bugs.
Community addons are available from: http://addons.nvda-project.org To send a message to the list: nvda-addons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To change your list settings/unsubscribe: //www.freelists.org/list/nvda-addons To contact list moderators: nvda-addons-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx