. Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:54:11 -0700 From: Richard Hake <rrhake@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: Net-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: math-teach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, math-learn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, naturalmath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, PHYSLRNR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: AERA-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mathedcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Net-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Net-Gold] Re: Concept Inventories in Mathematics In response to my post "Concept Inventories in Mathematics" [Hake (2010], Math-Teach's Robert Hansen (2010) made two absurd statements to which I shall respond in order: 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1. "The FCI and similar strategies are geared toward students that have had little to no preparation in the subject and that are not expected to continue the subject past a shallow 'appreciative' introduction of the subject." NONSENSE! The FCI [Hestenes et al. (1992), Halloun et al. (1995)] and its precursor the Mechanics Diagnostic [Halloun & Hestenes (1985a,b)] test understanding of the basic concepts of Newtonian mechanics. They are NOT "geared toward students that have had little to no preparation in the subject and that are not expected to continue the subject past a shallow 'appreciative' introduction of the subject." 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 2. "The Compass tests in mathematics are very much unlike 'concept inventories' (like the FCI) because (as noted above) they expect the student to have developed actual acumen with the material, beyond some artificial common sense." Since when are tests such as the FCI and Mechanics Diagnostic which test basic concepts of Newtonian mechanics only gauges of "artificial common sense." Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands President, PEdants for Definitive Academic References which Recognize the Invention of the Internet (PEDARRII) <rrhake@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake> <http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi> <http://HakesEdStuff.blogspot.com> <http://iub.academia.edu/RichardHake> REFERENCES [All URL's accessed on 22 August 2010; some shortened by <http://bit.ly/>.] Hake, R.R. 2010. "Concept Inventories in Mathematics," online on the OPEN! Math-Teach archives at <http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=2144651&tstart=0>. Post of post of 21 September 2010 4:39:00-0700 to Math-Learn, Math-Teach, NaturalMath, and PhysLrnR. Transmitted to AERA-L, MathEDCC, and Net-Gold on 22 September 2010. Halloun, I. & D. Hestenes. 1985a. "The initial knowledge state of college physics students." Am. J. Phys. 53: 1043-1055; online at <http://bit.ly/b1488v> - see under "Evaluation Instruments." The print version contains the Mechanics Diagnostic Test. Halloun, I. & D. Hestenes. 1985b. "Common sense concepts about motion," Am. J. Phys. 53: 1056-1065; online at <http://bit.ly/b1488v> - see under "Evaluation Instruments." Halloun, I., R.R. Hake, E.P. Mosca, & D. Hestenes, "Force Concept Inventory (1995 Revision)," online (password protected) at <http://bit.ly/b1488v>, scroll down to "Evaluation Instruments." Currently available in 20 languages: Arabic, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, English, Finnish, French, French (Canadian), German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Malaysian, Persian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Slovak, Swedish, & Turkish. Hansen, R. 2010. "Re: Concept Inventories in Mathematics," Math-Teach post of post of 22 September 2010 12:22 AM (the Math Forum fails to indicate the time zone); online on the OPEN! Math-Teach archives at <http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7213830&tstart=0>. Hestenes, D., M. Wells, & G. Swackhamer, "Force Concept Inventory," Phys. Teach. 30(3), 141-158 (1992); online (but without the test itself) at <http://bit.ly/b1488v>. .