[nanomsg] Re: Release packaging and build systems
- From: Martin Lucina <martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:47:01 +0200
dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx said:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thougts anyone? Arguments for keeping the 0MQ compatibility library in
> > place?
>
> I think removing the compatibility library would be fine, for the
> reasons you state.
+1
Just curious, what's the motivation behind reintroducing autoconf?
Has CMake not lived up to its major promise which (AFAIK) is a unified
build system for Windows and POSIX?
I have a certain "fondness" for autoconf, after all I did maintain the
ZeroMQ/XS build for some time, but one build system seems better than two.
Cheers,
-mato
>
Other related posts:
