By the way it would be very helpful if any changes the protocol or transports, or semantic changes were announced here. I've not been following the nanomsg source closely but I would like to make sure mangos remains compatible. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 27, 2014, at 7:53 AM, Jack Dunaway <jack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Status update on the ws:// protocol: my earnest goal is to push to a fork by > tomorrow with an announcement on this list requesting feedback and code > review. I agree with Martin to consider a new release separately from > evaluating a new WebSocket protocol! And I am very happy to see the buzz of > new activity generated by your suggestion for a release, Dirkjan! > > Best regards, > > Jack R. Dunaway | Wirebird Labs LLC > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> For your convenience I've summarised the release process here: >> >> http://nanomsg.org/development.html >> >> Martin >> >> On 27/10/14 10:24, Martin Sustrik wrote: >> > On 27/10/14 10:17, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Martin Sustrik >> >> <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I would say just do the release now, if that's what you want >> >>> to do. >> > >> >> How do you feel about it? >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > There haven't been a release for a while. >> > >> > Martin >> > >> > >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUTjvmAAoJENTpVjxCNN9Y4N8IAIQkTOSeWN8Izz6Sz3O+n+aJ >> Fw164IJvEBzmq3/KcV1YnqSdcKcOeTNYwTiwVWMovzPabAXRN3NBw7b+bqelUxnV >> oIcldimmheMOe7ozflniA/UHBtaXgQXedxKERKFQCQLXeFzNIShWtiESveqhJ0L3 >> Yws8Zdx8kvk5JqlBTWJiuCXEknjDykrvs6GP+ONpFpVIIeNJYvd1hijf/rBxOOb/ >> 7knk3MkQeOJ726HrXALwq6YSQYBMxMpqO5Venx2DIlev7HQ7eVor0jycLqDW/heO >> BxGBRhv4qIeHvBSCpoPPGT/X4Gh7x4zWG+SpF673WZv3lLmp6i2XTH/NFoc8gV0= >> =zU7d >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >