[nanomsg] Re: New release?
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:37:49 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dirkjan,
> It feels to me like we've gathered a fair bit of bug fixing on the
> master branch, and it might be a good moment to do a new release.
> Maybe see if we can #310 and #320 merged, and ping Drew on #285?
As for #310, this is a rather big patch and I would rather merge it in
after the release.
#320 proabably won't be merged as it breaks the semantics of pub/sub
use case.
#285 is actually turn out to be a workaround for a bug. We should fix
the bug instead of augmenting the API by random cruft.
> One reason to hold off a bit longer might be if the WS transport
> is just around the corner. Jack, do you have some sort of rough
> ETA/status on that?
I would say just do the release now, if that's what you want to do.
Polishing a new transport will take some time anyway. No much point in
having the first raw version in the release.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUTgRdAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YCvoH/1vRlT5g6JsB/cjJgBT91SZT
vUc8euP62LnIR1N/CCtPvD9i80/dZgKao4gINzQpjzpRis9jfAwuR0I+UB4g3Hp6
wIVrqV0UpGxFPf9PTlHmSm4hx/nLqiNxGfTXkNL8qtfzMgLpVOcZMKLVjf956URF
SdURzdECtFCxlEj0ep3V+pg4S/N8a6En+1glTd5ICZwpNalTky7eRwTIbCHfRsDk
yUbFeQxTWpiV3TCl12awn1zUoGzRPLdgfMn/UlvF2VF+jMvyu1x5Lpc81gOtLGAb
ghmtBaYL+FV+nr+cDypBG9AXzcK0PqBId/cybuZkWWbPb5WYD6wUNF6qXddITRY=
=YAhg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
