[nanomsg] Re: Dealing with the state machines
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:28:23 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 31/10/14 14:26, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> I like state machine usually, but the number and complexity of them
> in nanomsg was something I found to be too high to my taste. When
> I approached writing mangos, I took a different approach. There’s
> not much explicit FSM stuff in mangos, as a result, and the code is
> pretty straight-forward.
That's because Go supports coroutines directly, I guess. No?
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUU453AAoJENTpVjxCNN9YEioH/0KfRjf1h64HWw0BqnUBTvr1
n5j8VHBRL/uELQtsOe4bd8UlEJA2j7FXzhzmjl/hkKVXydRIYQOtISf8RRfdfzz6
B7ZAfnie/lYBIgSpLD69zpO3CTtCv2iZgcFs+r1sO873bLMHvz8iYtNWc7gH8bW+
2eVoQ/P3HW9GG3QNGEAfMBgskXp9QazL1iINhOCQKK/F39LH3+cCpRo+cPnI0r5x
8JSYuVFyoxJ5495vvb4M5UhH95CrwGAuiDT79OZO/RjFH69eet/RXxl4HguG5eNZ
8dGwZuzbbLPlqYl0Ut5oCn379v95CG/TM98Epv/BW5fEtERRbH/DSivPlofX4/8=
=sd5o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
