On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 02:22:30PM -0400, S. Massy wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 09:02:18PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote: > > I've applied the latency compensation patch. As Massy > > wrote, it's currently necessary to use the -Q flag if you > > want latency compensation. > I've been testing latency comp for a good week now and it seems to be > doing the right thing, at least as far as busses, subbusses and > subsubbusses are concerned. Cool stuff. Amazing! I'll feel better if we can have a few test cases to be sure we're getting what we want. > On an unrelated note, add_effect_chain seems to be broken, yielding > this: > caught error: Can't call method "add" on an undefined value at > (eval 1137) line 48458. Caused by a wrongly named effect chain. Now fails like this: frongbrax: effect chain not found > Cheers, > S.M. -- Joel Roth