[nama] Re: Catching up with Massy's patches

  • From: Joel Roth <joelz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 22:34:38 -1000

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 02:22:30PM -0400, S. Massy wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 09:02:18PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > I've applied the latency compensation patch.  As Massy
> > wrote, it's currently necessary to use the -Q flag if you
> > want latency compensation.
> I've been testing latency comp for a good week now and it seems to be
> doing the right thing, at least as far as busses, subbusses and
> subsubbusses are concerned. Cool stuff.

Amazing! I'll feel better if we can have a few test
cases to be sure we're getting what we want.
> On an unrelated note, add_effect_chain seems to be broken, yielding
> this:
> caught error: Can't call method "add" on an undefined value at 
>   (eval 1137) line 48458.

Caused by a wrongly named effect chain. Now fails like this:

frongbrax: effect chain not found

> Cheers,
> S.M.

Joel Roth

Other related posts: