[muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- From: "Jeremy Friesner" <jaf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:32:06 PST (-0800)
> However, I don't think it's needed. Most people nowadays work with JDK
> 1.4.0 or higher, and they would be able to use the new code.
Hm, it does seem that Java 1.4.0 was released in February 2002, so maybe
that is long enough ago. :^) I will try your patch at work and see how it
goes.
> Are people using MUSCLE in a web browser?
Well, I am anyway... dunno if anybody else is.
> I'm seeing a lot of time spent in the LEDataOutputStream
> class, so this patch is the start of my attempts to "make it better".
[...]
> In my first profiling comparision between the NIO and old I/O code,
> sending 1200 Messages takes 30% more time with old I/O than it does with
> nio.
Sounds good... please keep me posted on your progress.
Jeremy
- References:
- [muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- From: Lior Okman
Other related posts:
- » [muscle] Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- » [muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- » [muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- » [muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- » [muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- » [muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- » [muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- [muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client
- From: Lior Okman