Dear Bastien, > On Wednesday 20 July 2011 14:32:25 Nestor Zaburannyi wrote: >> For one dataset (454 PE) i got such messages: >> "The reads X, Y, Z, W have the same template and MIRA was unable to >> differentiate between different trials. Template information not used >> there." > Strange ... did the data come straight out of sff_extract or does it contain > something else? Because that would mean there's a bug in the PE extraction > module there then :-( > Or you have identical reads in different SFFs (possibly through repackaging). > Or reads in different SFFs are named identically, but I though that 454 > changed their naming already quite some time ago to make that almost > impossible. Hmm... To tell you the truth, i really don't know how files were generated. I can even show you "THE file": ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/TraceDB/streptomyces_albus_j1074/fasta.streptomyces_albus_j1074.001.gz If you are interested, you can view it and search for ".T1" and four surrounding reads. Those will be >gnl|ti|2099518166 BI018061e870732a2cbb74c44d34e95a17.F.6.T0 >gnl|ti|2099518167 BI018061e870732a2cbb74c44d34e95a17.F.6.T1 >gnl|ti|2099518168 BI018061e870732a2cbb74c44d34e95a17.R.6.T0 >gnl|ti|2099518169 BI018061e870732a2cbb74c44d34e95a17.R.6.T1 all the four reads have correspondingly <TRACE_ID>BI018061e870732a2cbb74c44d34e95a17</TRACE_ID> in *.xml file. You'll then see what i mean. > Could yopu please check which of the above may be what's hitting you? >> Really, there are several reads (up to 6) for one template_id, but this >> happens rarely (approx. 1000 of such templates). Should i just ignore this >> message, or should i split them to unique pairs by using the TRACE_NAME >> field which is different for every F/R pair? > If there are only a few, you can as well let MIRA continue. > B. Sincerely yours Nestor -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html