Re:Re: Re: ELF file OS ABI invalid
- From: chzong <chzong@xxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:45:03 +0800 (CST)
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your help.
I have solved the problem.
Just as you said , the .so file was bad .
It is very strange When I using ld to translate the .o to the .so, I should
never place the .o compile by luajit in the front of other .o . Otherwise the
"OS/ABI" field of ELF header
will be changed to "ARM". The correct value is "UNIX - System V".
This is my link command below: the scimarklib.o is compile by luajit.
/proj/toolchain/armv7a-vfp-neon-wrs-linux/host-cross/usr/toolchain/bin/arm-wrs-linux-gnueabi-ld
--sysroot=/proj/toolchain/armv7a-vfp-neon-wrs-linux/sysroots/cortexa9-vfp-neon-wrs-linux-gnueabi
-share -fPIC scimarklib.o -L./ -lluajit-5.1 -o scimarklibarm.so
By the way , We plan to use Cortex A57 arm cpu on our board . Will luajit
support ARM64 architecture in the next two years?
Thanks again.
Regards
Cheng
At 2014-09-30 20:18:21, "Mike Pall" <mike-1409@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>chzong wrote:
>> The binary has more information ,it has more flags and attributes.
>> I think the .o compiled by command "luajit -b -a arm" without the flags
>> and attributes will not work on my target board.
>> How can I make the .o with the flags and attributes ?
>
>No, the .o is fine. You need to fix how you translate from the .o
>to the .so.
>
>--Mike
>
Other related posts:
- » Re:Re: Re: ELF file OS ABI invalid - chzong