Re: ELF file OS ABI invalid
- From: Mike Pall <mike-1410@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:00:10 +0200
chzong wrote:
> Just as you said , the .so file was bad .
> It is very strange When I using ld to translate the .o to the .so, I should
> never place the .o compile by luajit in the front of other .o . Otherwise the
> "OS/ABI" field of ELF header
> will be changed to "ARM". The correct value is "UNIX - System V".
> This is my link command below: the scimarklib.o is compile by luajit.
>
> /proj/toolchain/armv7a-vfp-neon-wrs-linux/host-cross/usr/toolchain/bin/arm-wrs-linux-gnueabi-ld
>
> --sysroot=/proj/toolchain/armv7a-vfp-neon-wrs-linux/sysroots/cortexa9-vfp-neon-wrs-linux-gnueabi
> -share -fPIC scimarklib.o -L./ -lluajit-5.1 -o scimarklibarm.so
Nowadaye, one should never use ld directly. Always use the
compiler frontend, i.e. the cross-gcc in your case. This usually
ensures that this doesn't happen (by adding a preamble .o).
> By the way , We plan to use Cortex A57 arm cpu on our board .
> Will luajit support ARM64 architecture in the next two years?
Anybody is welcome to contribute an ARM64 port.
--Mike
Other related posts:
