Here's a blatant attempt to find support for something I've been bleating about. QUOTE How, exactly, do people who don't agree with the Bush administration become French? How does a hack on a radio station latch on to such a nonsensical label? It's about picking something so indistinct that it could never be defined as categorically wrong, and then twisting its meaning to serve a purpose. Pick a hazy belief that the French were lazy and too self interested to really fight in World War II, then mix in some vaguely sexist, vaguely homophobic idea that they weren't man enough to stand up to the Nazis. Then, make sure to add that all people who stand up to you aren't man enough to stand with you. Then, in some sort of linguistic example of the transitive property, you get the dull-edged and cockamamie logic of: if the French are weak, and the people who don't support your war are weak, then the people who don't support your war, well they must be French! Start repeating this, over and over, until it's yapped back to you: "The French are weak!" "Weakness is Un-American!" and you've got yourself a tagline for the election: "John Kerry is French!" UNQUOTE And there's more... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/e-a-hanks/the-war-on-language_b_31061.html Simon Blatently bleating