[lit-ideas] The value of consistency

  • From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:40:56 +0100 (BST)

For those mainlining the second Critique, snorting the categorical imperative 
or spooning consistency, a rehab programme devised by the late Lord Bingham:-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/law-obituaries/7997574/Lord-Bingham-of-Cornhill.html

There it is writ:-

"Bingham was often described as a liberal with a small "l", and when asked 
about the description he admitted that he "wouldn't want to be called 
illiberal". He was suspicious, however, of the notion that the law lords could 
be easily categorised. "They're curiously unpredictable," he said. "I don't 
think any of us aims to be consistent. I actually regard consistency in a judge 
as a vice." "

Admittedly it is later writ:-

"Bingham's publications included The Business of Judging (2000) and, most 
recently, The Rule of Law (2010), a characteristically accessible explanation 
of such notions as equality before the law, respect for human rights and 
procedures that safeguard fair trials. As one reviewer wrote, the book also 
functions as an insight into "a special kind of mind": "Tom Bingham is a Lord 
Denning of sorts, but one with discipline in place of egoism" and "a consistent 
rather than selective sense of right and wrong"." 

But then, if consistency is a vice, this may be no bad thing. Or perhaps it is 
simply that the notion of consistency is itself here not being used 
consistently enough. 

The question whether law and morals may be rightly analogised here also raises 
its shrunken, hairless head.

Donal
Not so long ago, or far away







------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: