For those mainlining the second Critique, snorting the categorical imperative or spooning consistency, a rehab programme devised by the late Lord Bingham:- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/law-obituaries/7997574/Lord-Bingham-of-Cornhill.html There it is writ:- "Bingham was often described as a liberal with a small "l", and when asked about the description he admitted that he "wouldn't want to be called illiberal". He was suspicious, however, of the notion that the law lords could be easily categorised. "They're curiously unpredictable," he said. "I don't think any of us aims to be consistent. I actually regard consistency in a judge as a vice." " Admittedly it is later writ:- "Bingham's publications included The Business of Judging (2000) and, most recently, The Rule of Law (2010), a characteristically accessible explanation of such notions as equality before the law, respect for human rights and procedures that safeguard fair trials. As one reviewer wrote, the book also functions as an insight into "a special kind of mind": "Tom Bingham is a Lord Denning of sorts, but one with discipline in place of egoism" and "a consistent rather than selective sense of right and wrong"." But then, if consistency is a vice, this may be no bad thing. Or perhaps it is simply that the notion of consistency is itself here not being used consistently enough. The question whether law and morals may be rightly analogised here also raises its shrunken, hairless head. Donal Not so long ago, or far away ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html