[lit-ideas] The pick o' the bunch us be

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:14:29 EST

As it happens,

>The South Saxons didn't have a compass.  

They just used the old Roman roads -- and kept off the  grass.

>If the South Saxons were 
>brought in as 'mercenaries'  to protect the Civitate ruled by 
>some local magnate it would make   loads of sense to 
>teach them the topography of the landscape including  
>the river systems and the road networks. 

Assuming they would  undestand Latin! (or whatever that druid was speaking).I 
would find it very  difficult to teach a South Saxon _anything_ let alone the 
Highway Code or Cowes  Chart.

>It so happens that the principal South Saxon settlements  
>follow the road network sufficiently to be able to conjecture  
>that either they were 'placed'  at strategic points, or
>  that when they decided to expand they used the road 
>network as the  routes of their advance.

Yes, they _would_ keep off the  grass.

>The 'traditional' view of South Saxon expansion has  
>them landing at Selsey, defeat the Brits
>occupy Chichester, fight  their way along the South 
>Downs until they 
>fbeseiged the Romans  at Pevensey. 
>Trouble is, this view bears no resemblance to the  archaeology. There's no 
early 
>Saxon remains so far discovered in Selsey,  no remains within 
>Chichester and, perhaps most telling 
>Pevensey  was continuously occupied from its inception right up to the 
Middle  
>ages.

It _is_ a lovely story, you must grant. I can't think  Trevelyan thought 
different?!

>So ... there's ample room to fit the  evidence, quite 
>comfortably even, into an alternative scenario, perhaps  
>utilising the 'balkanisation theory'. 

Is this politically  correct? I mean, I care a fig but know next to nihil 
about the Balkans. Are you  meaning the Turks? Lord Byron, etc. 

>Local magnate, 
>eager for  expansion or protective of his 
>lands goes out and brings in a few  boatloads 
>of Germanic mercenaries ... 

Goes out -- I hope you  don't mean literally (literarily). I've been to the 
Netherlands ("Witte schwanne  swartze schwanne will u toe Englaland faren?") 
and was surprised how *close* it  is to England. So I can see the magnate 
yachting to, say, Ostende to find those  Saxons. 

Indeed, my pet theory is that Procopius and Tacitus are right  that the 
Frisians _were_ in England. Not as invaders, though -- but because the  North 
Sea 
naturally led them, sailingwise, to Anglia. Geary indeed wrote about  this: he 
thinks "Anglia" is the land of the 'anglers' (alla "The Compleat  Angler") 

>places them along the principal estuaries before settling  
>them in the hinterlands north of the downs protecting the 
>Roman  road network. 
>He pays them the gold and grain 
>while he can, but  when this dries up 
>there's a bit of 
>treacherous behaviour and  they take over, 

Exactly. While the 'heroic' tale says that the warriors  wedded the Brit 
virgin princesses.

>bossing the locals who for the  
>most part just want to get on with their lives. Much later, 
>when  the time comes to write the histories, this doesn't have the right 
kind of  panache, 

Exactly. Oddly, they were boring monks -- the historians (e.g.  Beda). I 
cannot think why they didn't stick to the truth as they knew it.  

>so boatloads of mercenaries become heroic invaders 
>landing  in a strange hostile country and forced to fight for 
>their very  lives.

Quite a dilemma, but cfr. Geary, "My hero was a mercenary". Ditto  in Roman, 
'soldier' comes from 'salary'. Very unromantic. 

>If that  wasn't exciting enough Sussex is such 
>that the amateur can easily trace  the route of the 
>Roman Road network, 

with the automobile. As  Duchess of Devonshire says, "It was the automobile 
that re-valued the stately  homes. English people found themselves with a car 
but nowhere to go!" You _have_  to read "Counting my chicken". It was banned in 
the US. 

>find  crossing points and within an hour 
>be standing on the very spot where  
>a confrontation took place some 1,500 years 
>before. 
>An  hour later he might walk round the walls at 
>Pevensey where there might  not have been a siege, 
>or maybe drive again and be at the other end of  the Civitate, 
>striding round the walls of Chichester which probably  
>wasn't taken by Aelle after he didn't land at Selsey.
>Or maybe he  can find the Ambrosian Camps established after Badon....
>The  possibilities aren't endless 

But the gas is! And I assume the guide  tours have a fieldday. When I was in 
London I took one of those guided tours and  I was impressed at the lot of 
bullshit the woman kept narrating for the sake of  entertainment. I suppose 
they 
are, in price-tag Britain, even 'cycle tours' of  the Balcan Sussex, no? Just 
joking.

Loved your racconto!

Next we  have to do Devon -- I love that ballad, that mentions all the 
counties ending  with "Devon":

Dorset, Somerset, Corn'all, Wales
may envy the likes of  we.
For the flower of the West,
the first, the best,
the pick o' the  bunch us be.

Okay -- next. So you think you know all about Devon?

Cheers,

JL
 
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts:

  • » [lit-ideas] The pick o' the bunch us be - Jlsperanza