[lit-ideas] Re: The Big Book of Happiness

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:56:04 EDT

 
 
Andy Amago had written:
 
>Americans are _not_ the happiest people in the world, 
>_literally_.  ... We might even be below some African  
>nations. 




I'm grateful for his references:

>For  starters:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/12/24/M
N165379.DTL

>I  couldn't [locate] the study that surveyed African 
>nations as well.  It may have been mentioned in 
>passing wherever I read it that they are surprising[ly]
>happy (obviously those not war torn).  AIDS is changing 
>everything now [implicature: making them not so happy
>as they should otherwise be]. Search rating countries 
>happiness on google.  If I find anything else, I'll send  it.   


Okay. Shall be waiting. "Happiness" is a special interest with me --  
especially the Seeking of It. 
 
I note that the link provided by Andy Amago makes a reference to a new  
journal

"The Journal of Happiness Studies, edited by sociology professor Ruut  
Veenhoven of Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands."
 
It goes on to survey what the happiest 'regions' in the USA could be:
 
     Could it have something to do with the high levels  of 
     happiness reported in rural parts of the United  States? 
     Hagerty [Professor of Quality of Life in UC/Davis] 
     points out that rural states -- "the heartland" -- 
     are consistently the happiest: "There's not a lot 
     of migration out. Families stay stable." The  happiest 
     states are what Hagerty calls "the TVA (Tennessee 
     Valley Authority) region" -- [including]  Tennessee.
 
-- the land of Geary. Incidentally, his brother, moved to Denmark,  mentioned 
in the source:
 
     The happiest _countries_, Hagerty finds, tend to 
     have relatively small populations and to be  situated in 
     northern Europe. Denmark ranks far and away as the 
     happiest nation on Earth. People there have a  similar 
     world view and a similar religion, so that it's  easier for 
     them to communicate and to understand each other's 
     motives," Hagerty says. "They don't have race  problems."
 
-- and their families are stable, he forgot. 
 
A note on the 'survey':
 
     The surveys had one question in common: 
     "How happy are you?" They covered hundreds 
     of thousands of people in more than 20 nations. 
 
I hope they did some good research as to how 'happy' translates. For  
example, I'm not sure what's 'happy' in Danish (something related to 'glad'?).  
In 
Romance languages, it's 'felix', as in 'Re-Hab':
 
   playing checkers with a roadie from Save  Ferris
then she hit Los Feliz with some homemade earrings to  sell
but the hip gift shop assistant led her back to  hell

"Los Feliz" (The Happy (Few?)).
 
Grice has an essay on happiness. He concludes that the Greeks were probably  
right in calling the thing eudaimonia, since to be happy (eudaimones) is all  
about having a good daemon.
 
"Commentators have disagreed about the precise interpretation of the word  
'eudaemonia', but none, so far as I know, has suggested what I think of as much 
 
the most plausible conjecture; namely, that 'eudaemonia' is to be understood 
as  the _name_ for that _state_ (or _condition_) which one's good _daemon_ 
would (if  he could) ensure for one; and my good _daemon_ is a being motivated, 
with  respect to me, solely by concern for my well-being or happiness. To 
change the  idiom, 'eudaimonia' is the general characterisation of what a 
full-time 
and  unhampered fairy godmother would secure for you. The identifications 
regarded by  Aristotle as unexcitingly correct, of _eudaimonia_ with doing well 
and with  living well, now begin to look like necessary truths. If this 
interpretation of  'eudaimonia' is correct (as I shall brazenly assume) then it 
would 
be quite  impossible for Y's life to be more desirable than X's, though X and 
Y are equal  in respect to _eudaimonia_; for this would amount to Y's being 
better off than  X, though both are equally well-off." (Grice, _Aspects of 
Reason_, lecture 6:  Some reflections about ends and happiness', Clarendon 
Press, 
p. 116).
 
Cheers,
 
JL



------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: