A post script to my post: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxAZ_FLudKc&NR=1 I wish I had just a glimmer of an inkling of the what any of these mean. Mike On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Mike Geary <jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > ScienceDaily (Oct. 31, 2010) — Researchers at Oregon State University have > solved a quest in fundamental material science that has eluded scientists > since the 1960s, and could form the basis of a new approach to electronics. > > "This is a fundamental change in the way you could produce electronic > products, at high speed on a huge scale at very low cost, even less than > with conventional methods," Keszler said. "It's a basic way to eliminate the > current speed limitations of electrons that have to move through materials." > > Also on the horizon are "energy harvesting" technologies such as the > nighttime capture of re-radiated solar energy, a way to produce energy from > the Earth as it cools during the night. > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101029152751.htm > > > IT'S A SQUIGGLY-WIGGLY WORLD > > "O that this too too solid flesh would thaw, melt, resolve itself into a > dew..." > > Billy Boy had it right and long before we knew of the nothingness of what > is. > > I read once of a physicist who wore snow shoes wherever he went fearing > that he might otherwise sink into the earth. > I often feel like that. Who remembers Buckaroo Bonzai and the car that > could drive through solid rock? Hey, if a cosmic ray can do it, why not > Buckaroo? > > Is existence an illusion? There's nothing there but energy, right? Slow > it all down and you can have a 5 billion year old planet -- but not the > same, not the same one even for an instant. It's constantly, instantly > changing, subatomically at least, as are our own bodies, Muons and pions > shoot out from us like fireworks, and others jump in to take their place. > > Sayeth Billy Boy: > *Hamlet: To what base uses we may return, Horatio! Why may not imagination > trace the noble dust of Alexander, till he find it stopping a bung-hole?** > Horatio: 'Twere to consider too curiously, to consider so.**Hamlet: No, > faith, not a jot; but to follow him thither with modesty enough, and > likelihood to lead it: as thus: Alexander died, Alexander was buried, > Alexander returneth into dust; the dust is earth; of earth we make loam; and > why of that loam, whereto he was converted, might they not stop a > beer-barrel?* > Billy Boy didn't know about subatomic particles, but his instincts were > right. We are each of us wads of what once was. Some object to > reductionism insisting that we are more than positive and negative > electrical charges. For me, lightening proves there's a god and that he is > the Omnipotent Squiggly Wiggly of existence. > > Mike Geary > throwing off hadrons in Memphis >