W.O.
...inditing RP on charges of gross defamation of a cultural symbol of the Canadian nation: the beaver.
Beaver! [titter, snicker, giggle] I've always thought you guys were a bunch of pussies. And don't get on your high horse, I mean the animals. [titter, snicker, giggle].
Mike Geary Memphis----- Original Message ----- From: <wokshevs@xxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Robert Paul" <rpaul@xxxxxxxx> Cc: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:38 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Revisiting Judy's World
Quoting Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>:Walter wrote > Profanity is rarely to be condoned, and not in this case.RP:The Villge Grammarian, while granting that 'profanity' is now used to describe any coarse or vulgar speech or writing, suggests that members of lit-ideas should be held to a higher standard and restrict their use of that term to speech or writing that profane sacred things, i.e., words or expressions that 'express a disregard or contempt' for them, and are 'irreverent, blasphemous, and impious.' Thus, while 'God damn it,' is profane, 'Fuck you,' is not Mr. Geary, although strongly cautioned, is found not guilty. Professor Okshevsky is to pay court costs of one Canadian five-cent piece, on which a beaver is shown buggering a rock. Robert Paul The Reed InstituteWO:Let it be known to all men (and some women) that I hereby inform RP that my attorneys intend to appeal this verdict on grounds of illegitimate stipulative definition and grievous linguistic coercion. My alleged and putative failure toaccord with "higher standards" is in fact but a principled and benigncommitment to a *different* standard. In a secular universe, such as the one Iand my tribe inhabit, "sacred" is a meaningless term having no cognitivesignificance, denotative reference, or even intelligible connotation. Hence, my de-divinized understanding of "profanity" is fully justified from the moral point of view, and may even possess a certain degree of democratic legitimacy.Let it also be known that both the Canadian Charter, the AmericanConstitution, and whatever it is that they have in Great Britain, secure myrights to the pursuit of such semantic diversity and serve to impugn all attempts by self-appointed officials of the Englischlanguage to coerce conformity with an unwarranted stipulative definition thattransgresses my rights to 1) the enjoyment of a reasonableconception of authenticity and the good life, 2) bear arms against a sea oftrobles and 3)not have to compete with illegal Mexicans for positions of employment I would never seek in the first place. Let it now, forthwith and hereby also be known that a counter-suit will belaunched, upon my advisory, by the Canadian Ministry of Cultural and Animal Affairs inditing RP on charges of gross defamation of a cultural symbol of the Canadian nation: the beaver. It will be alleged and proven beyond reasonable doubt that RP's words constitute egregious hate speech directed at a speciesprotected by the Canadian Autobahn Society (roadkill notwithstanding).Compensation and restitution will be determined at a future time subsequent tothe liquidation of RP's total final estate.Let it not go unsaid that consequences of successful litigation against RP will bear significantly upon Mr. Mike Geary's future financial, housing and sailingfreedoms. Walter O. Through representation by Rabinowitz, Rabinowitz and McCarthy Attorneys at Law and Morality Red Bay, Labrador Canada------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html