Paul Stone writes: : At 03:59 PM 8/4/2004, you wrote: : >I'm not sure that 'Putsch' means 'an argument, spat, or disagreement,' : >which is : >what PS was looking for. It usually means 'coup,' as in the failed Putsch : >attempt in Austria in 1934. : > : >Waiting for correction from Mainz, I remain, : : It does mean "coup" and that IS the word I was looking for. If anyone is : interested, the reason I asked is because I watched a movie called "The : Grey Zone" over the weekend. It was about a bunch of what were called : Kommandos at a group of 4 nazi death camps during WWII. Each group of : kommandos were Jews who operated the ovens and ran the gas chambers in : exchange for food/drink/comfort privileges and, in varying degrees, : approximately 4 extra months of life. : : In any case, in one scene, a doctor (who was himself a compromised Jew : who assisted Dr. Mengele) was arguing with the director of the camp about : the Naziism and the commander was talking about the need for one race so : that there would be no more wars. The doctor replied, "but you already have : wars within your pure race". The commander said "those are not wars, they : are putsches" and goes on about the semantic difference and the reason that : there were two different words etc., but he never did SAY what the word : actually meant. All I could glean was that, in the commander's estimation, : a "putsch" was nowhere near as serious. I guess I was sort of right, but : not nearly. In my Langenscheidt's Pocket Dictionary the Germam ``Putsch'' is translated as ``putsch, riot.'' I take it that ``riot'' catches the commander's meaning. -- Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH EMAIL: junger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu NOTE: junger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx no longer exists ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html