Le 7 ao=FBt 04, =E0 19:43, Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx a =E9crit : > > > "The demonstrable correlation of opposites > is an image of the transcendental correlation > of contradictories." > S. Weil, Le Pensateur et la Grace, > tr. A. Wills. > > E. Holder writes: > >> It's cute, this square [of opposition]. > > > > M. Chase comments: > >> It is kind of cute, but like Robert Paul I doubt >> it has anything to do with Weil. Far from drawing >> a distinction between "opposites" and "contradictories", >> Aristotle (Categories 10, 11b15 ff.) considers >> contraries or contradictories to be one of four >> sub-classes of the class "opposites", the others >> being relatives, privation vs. possession, and >> affirmation and negation. Again like R. Paul, I think >> Weil is just using terminology loosely to >> allude to Nicolas of Cusa's >> idea of the *coincidentia oppositorum*. > > > > Wonder what book by Cusa Weil could have read. > > Cusa was a favourite author with J.L. Borges -- Cusa's definition of=20= > God as > the circle whose center is nowhere and the circumsference is=20 > everywhere. > > Doesn't the 'coincidentia oppositorum' trace back to Pythagoras and = the > other Pre-socratics? M.C. I'm not sure about Pythagoras, although Philolaus fr. 7 does speak=20= of the Pythagorean view that opposing powers of the cosmos are held=20 together by *harmonia* or reconciliation. Better attested are=20 Empedocles' views, according to which Harmonia or love (Greek=20 *Philot=EAs*) is the power that creates unity out of potentially hostile=20= contraries=A0; and especially Heraclitus, who held that reality consists=20= in an apparent war between contraries that is in fact a harmony. Cf.=20 fragment 53 Diels-Kranz (=3D fr. 83 in the excellent study by Charles=20 Kahn, Art and thought of Heraclitus, Cambridge 1979, p. 207ff)=A0: War = is=20 father of all and king of all. As Kahn writes (p. 209) ...it would be=20 tedious to attempt a catalogue of all examples of polar contrsat or=20 opposition [sc. in Heraclitus]: there is scarcely a text of Heraclitus=20= that would not have to be included....the doctrine of opposites, like=20 the thesis of unity which is its counterpart, is coextensive with=20 Heraclitus' thought as a whole". As far as whence Weil might have known Nicolas of Cusa=A0: = perhaps from=20 Maurice de Gandillac's Philosophie de Nicolas de Cuse (1941), and/or=20 his Oeuvres choisies de Nicolas de Cuse (1942). By the way, Nicolas took over the idea of God as a circle etc. = from=20 the Hermetic Book of the 24 philosophers. Best, Mike. > > Michael Chase (goya@xxxxxxxxxxx) CNRS UPR 76 7, rue Guy Moquet Villejuif 94801 France ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html