[lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- From: Judith Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:43:54 +0100 (BST)
Interesting. They found that common article 3 of
the Geneva Conventions applies to Guantanamo:
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/0/e160550475c4b133c12563cd0051aa66?OpenDocument
which has all kinds of implications
(sorry to cut your song!)
Judy Evans, Cardiff
___________________________________________________________
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" ? The
Wall Street Journal
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- From: Mike Geary
- References:
- [lit-ideas] New Song for a New Era.
- From: Mike Geary
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] New Song for a New Era.
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- [lit-ideas] Re: New Song for a New Era.
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] New Song for a New Era.
- From: Mike Geary