William Dolphin wrote
I realize Eric's comment about Friere is a throwaway gibe, but since it touches on one of the few areas I am marginally qualified to engage, I will quickly note that the article linked grossly mischaracterizes whatI understand to be the core concepts of Friere's pedagogy.
In 1984, I supervised a thesis on some aspects of Freire's pedagogy.I was not then especially conversant with Freire, and I agreed to supervise the thesis only if the student (who was conversant with it) would guide me by selecting the readings, explaining their relative importance and their interrelationships. It was a good thesis. While we read and discussed Freire together I found nothing in his thought and writings that resembled the (scary) caricature of him that has been presented to us.
The thesis was 'Literacy and freedom: a study of Paulo Freire's pedagogy,' by Alejandro S. Plessl.
While looking it up in the Reed library's catalogue last night, I discovered that in 1982, I'd supervised a thesis with this engaging title:
'Language comes back from the holidays and finds the house in a horrible mess: Wittgenstein, family resemblances, definitions, and knowledge.' by
Stephan Robert Heilmayr. Robert Paul, wondering what happened to the heat ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html