[lit-ideas] Re: LCD vs. CRT
- From: "Julie Krueger" <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:57:28 -0500
Stupid question, then .....
Is streaming audio/video on the computer generally HD?
(What I know about HD would fit into your standard thimble).
Julie Krueger
On 10/16/07, Judith Evans <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >This mystifies me.
>
> I think I know the answer. It seems CRTs are better for non-HD TV (the
> UK's only just
> into HD, it went for digital terrestrial first), LCDs for HD.
>
> Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Monday, September 03, 2007 8:17 PM
> *Subject:* [lit-ideas] Re: LCD vs. CRT
>
> This mystifies me. My old CRT (which was only a couple years old -- and
> not entirely an el cheapo) didn't give me nearly the picture quality that
> this LCD does. And this LCD was a lower-end price -- it's a HP, and I got
> it for a song because someone had purchased it, taken it home, purchased a
> new computer which came with a monitor, and returned this monitor. It was
> used for maybe a week, but lacked a box .... so good discount.
>
> On 9/3/07, Judith Evans <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Again -- what is the up-side of CRT's??
> > best picture quality (except for the most expensive LCD and plasma TVs)
> > plus cheapness. My TV cost I suppose one fifth what even a mediocre
> > LCD TV would have cost.
> >
> >
> > http://www.hdtvsolutions.com/big_picture_crt.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
Other related posts:
