[lit-ideas] Re: LCD vs. CRT
- From: "Judith Evans" <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:44:29 +0100
>This mystifies me.
I think I know the answer. It seems CRTs are better for non-HD TV (the UK's
only just
into HD, it went for digital terrestrial first), LCDs for HD.
Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
----- Original Message -----
From: Julie Krueger
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 8:17 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: LCD vs. CRT
This mystifies me. My old CRT (which was only a couple years old -- and not
entirely an el cheapo) didn't give me nearly the picture quality that this LCD
does. And this LCD was a lower-end price -- it's a HP, and I got it for a song
because someone had purchased it, taken it home, purchased a new computer which
came with a monitor, and returned this monitor. It was used for maybe a week,
but lacked a box .... so good discount.
On 9/3/07, Judith Evans <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Again -- what is the up-side of CRT's??
best picture quality (except for the most expensive LCD and plasma TVs)
plus cheapness. My TV cost I suppose one fifth what even a mediocre
LCD TV would have cost.
http://www.hdtvsolutions.com/big_picture_crt.htm
Other related posts:
