[lit-ideas] Re: It is worth a theorem, which is not the p minimal adequacy, since as it is, it is inconsistent. Hence Alfred Tajtelbaum, known to the ignorant of history as "tarski" proved that there exists a hierarchy such that the minimal adequacy is satisfied. That is in the "concept of truth in L" by the way studying helps.

From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:40:39 -0700

Adriano wrote

It is worth a theorem, which is not the p minimal adequacy, since as it
is, it is inconsistent. Hence Alfred Tajtelbaum, known to the ignorant
of history as "tarski"...

'In 1923, Alfred Teitelbaum and his brother Wacław changed their surnameto "Tarski", a name they invented because it sounded more Polish, wassimple to spell and pronounce, and seemed unused.'


Robert Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: It is worth a theorem, which is not the p minimal adequacy, since as it is, it is inconsistent. Hence Alfred Tajtelbaum, known to the ignorant of history as "tarski" proved that there exists a hierarchy such that the minimal adequacy is satisfied. That is in the "concept of truth in L" by the way studying helps.
  - From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] ] Re: It is worth a theorem, which is not the p minimal adequacy, since as it is, it is inconsistent. Hence Alfred Tajtelbaum, known to the ignorant of history as "tarski" proved that there exists a hierarchy such that the minimal adequacy is satisfied.
  - From: Adriano Palma

References:
- [lit-ideas] Grice on the alethic
  - From: Jlsperanza
- [lit-ideas] Re: Grice on the alethic
  - From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] It is worth a theorem, which is not the p minimal adequacy, since as it is, it is inconsistent. Hence Alfred Tajtelbaum, known to the ignorant of history as "tarski" proved that there exists a hierarchy such that the minimal adequacy is satisfied. That is in the "concept of truth in L" by the way studying helps.
  - From: Adriano Palma

Other related posts: