Unfortunately Robert's quotation is not given any commentary so that we might be enlightened as to whether W means more than merely the following: 'I' does not name a person: hence we do not say 'My name is I' etc. 'I' may refer to a person: e.g. 'I am a person not a machine, Mr. Turing'. If something more profound or interesting is afoot we should perhaps be told. In particular, if W is denying that 'I' may refer to a person just as 'there' may refer to a place (on the face of it W doesn't deny they may so refer). Thus the Crow did not 'name the killer' so much as admit he was the killer by referring to the killer as 'I'. Donal ________________________________ From: "Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx" <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2012, 18:59 Subject: [lit-ideas] In Grice's Name Grice on unnaming and unnecessity. In a message dated 6/25/2012 6:35:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rpaul@xxxxxxxx writes: Wittgenstein says, §410, '"I" doesn't name a person, nor "here" a place, and "this" is not a name, but they are connected with names...' On the other hand: The Wren: Who killed Cock Robin? The Crow: I did. Later on: The Sparrow (to the Wren): Did the Crow name the killer? OBVIOUS ANSWER: The Wren: "Yes, he did. Wittgensteinian Wren: "No, he didn't. He said that he had killed Cock Robin. His actual words were, "I did". But as Witters says in section 410, "I" does not name a person. The Sparrow: Or a bird. Cheers, Speranza ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html