[lit-ideas] Re: Hard core ideology

  • From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:08:19 -0700

Judy,

 

We’ve spoken about integration before.  Yes, there are some that integrate, but 
if there are large segments who won’t, if they form themselves into enclaves 
and prey upon the weak, damage property and disrupt society, something has gone 
seriously wrong.  I don’t say it is entirely their fault, but it is someone’s 
fault.   I have read that idealistic European leaders sought these immigrants 
to some extent in order to make up the shortfall in entitlements due to 
dwindling populations, but this doesn’t seem to be working.

 

I don’t live in Europe and must rely on newspaper articles, journalistic 
writings, etc., but whenever I’ve Googled these subjects to see if these 
writings are correct, I see photos of riots, people killed, cars were burned, 
etc.  And in places like the Netherlands and Scandinavia the common people, 
people Jack Sprat worries about in other circumstances, rebelling against what 
they describe as an unwanted influx of immigrants.   

 

I have read that a large part of the problem is that a majority of the common 
people of Europe don’t want these immigrants moving into their nations.  Why 
didn’t European leadership know that?  Why force unwanted immigrants into a 
society that rejects them?  I’m not saying it is right that these Europeans 
reject them merely that this is the case to a considerable extent.  European 
leadership seems bent on solving this problem by making laws punishing the 
common people for not accepting these immigrants.   Does that seem right to you?

 

You asked what I meant by “Social Security shortfall.”    Social Security was 
initially set up, if memory serves me, like an insurance policy.  It was not 
intended to be an entitlement.  Social Security Insurance, however, depended 
upon a growing population so that more people would be putting money into it 
than taking it out.  All Western nations today are being faced with dwindling 
populations such that a time can be foreseen when there will not be enough 
money being paid into these insurance policies to pay the people who want to 
retire.  The common fix has been to encourage immigration so that these 
immigrants can pay into the policy and thereby let old people continue to 
retire.  I am suggesting that this expedient doesn’t seem to be working very 
well.  Why not, I ask, make Social Security an entitlement and pay for it with 
tax money – instead of counting on immigrants to pay for it.   

 

Lawrence

 

From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Judith Evans
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:44 AM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Hard core ideology

 


(Lawrence)
>>>>>>>>>>
The West has no intention of giving it up so when it discovers that its 
population isn’t growing, it imports workers from elsewhere. That would work 
out if the imported workers fit the pattern we have in America, but in much of 
Europe they have been importing Islamic Fundamentalists who have no intention 
of integrating into European society. It would be better, in my opinion for 
these nations (and ours) to decide to pay for the Social Security shortfall as 
another entitlement. If foreign workers can’t or won’t integrate, it would be 
better for all concerned if they stayed in their own countries.
<<<<<<<<<<

I take it you mean "importing Muslims".  Various European countries indeed 
imported Muslims (and others from former colonies) as "guest workers", whose 
chances of integrating were minimal.  Though those programmes have faded, 
immigration restrictions have taken their place, and most Muslim entrants to EU 
countries, now, are asylum seekers or family members.  "Integration", well, it 
depends what you mean. I could name some notably integrated British Muslims -- 
that is, notable Britons who are Muslim and whom I'd call integrated -- but I'm 
not sure there's much point.

I don't know what you mean by "pay for the Social Security shortfall as another 
entitlement".

Judy Evans, Cardiff





 

Other related posts: