[lit-ideas] Re: Essence this (was: Re: another dabate?)
- From: Judy Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:51:33 +0100
That's more or less exactly what I thought, Stan. (Have you been
bugging my brain?!) I also thought that while as it were objectively
Kerry won many people would think Bush did, so was inclined to call it
a draw.
SS>Go to MSNBC.com and you'll see Kerry at 68% to Bush at 32%.
Perhaps not that surprising: Msn's round-by-round score gave it to
Kerry.
Saturday, October 9, 2004, 7:23:19 AM, Stan Spiegel wrote:
SS> Julie -
SS> Bush was more composed -- and did better this time. He showed how
SS> intelligent he is by remembering all his lies and articulating them in a
SS> fairly articulate way. You could see his blood pressure rising as you
SS> watched Kerry beat the shit out of him. But he gave as good as he got. Bush
SS> showed what a capable sociopath he is. CNN's polls -- while a few more
SS> Republicans than Democrats were represented -- showed Kerry to be the winner
SS> at 47% to 44%. Amazing! Go to MSNBC.com and you'll see Kerry at 68% to Bush
SS> at 32%. It'll be interesting to listen to Talk Radio tomorrow and listen to
SS> their perspective on the debate. What they can't garble, however, is that
SS> universally Kerry -- whether by large or small increments -- won. The stats
SS> are all in his favor.
SS> Karen Hughes was the prime GOP spinster and you heard her interesting
SS> distortions about how clearly and persuasively Bush has succeeded at
SS> job-creation. Hillary was the counterpoint for the Democratic viewpoint. You
SS> missed a worthwhile evening.
SS> Stan Spiegel
SS> still nervous in Maine
--
Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
