Thanks to JL for his contribution. 'Atomic' would have to be updated to 'Quark', I suppose -- or perhaps to 'String', but I don't understand any of that stuff. My opinion is my forte, and I try to stay within the realm of my expertise. Ava Tarr Memphis Institute of Telepathy ----- Original Message ----- From: <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 10:27 AM Subject: [lit-ideas] Elementary Propositon, Atomic Proposition > In a message dated 4/17/2004 10:34:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, > atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Much to Donal's chagrin, I'm with him here. If you can ask "what is?" of > any element of an EP and get an answer, then the EP ain't EPal. I suggest > that 'is' is the only EP. Bill Clinton would disagree and maybe Monica, > too. But I don't know how to analyse 'is', and I think that's the final > word on that. > Mike Geary > proud to be of service > > --- > > For what it's worth, there is, apparently, no collocation "elementary > proposition" in the OED. There are a few quotes for "ATOMIC proposition", though. > > I append below. I guess Wittgenstein would distinguish between 'elementary > proposition' and 'atomic proposition', but I'm not sure (Be reminded he spake > German). > > Cheers, > > JL > > ---- > > From the OED > > 'atomic'. > > > In modern philosophy: unanalysable, irreducible, ultimate, essential; also, > of a sentence: without conjunctions or other connective words. > > Cites -- as it applies to 'proposition': > > > 1912 L. WITTGENSTEIN Let. (to Russell) in Notebks. 1914-16 (1961) 120, > > I believe that our problems can be traced down to the atomic propositions. > > 1918 B. RUSSELL in Monist 523 > > An atomic proposition is one which does mention actual particulars, not > merely describe them but actually name them. > > 1922 tr. Wittgenstein's Tract. Log.-Phil. 31 > > An atomic fact is a combination of objects (entities, things). > > 1929 WITTGENSTEIN in Knowledge, Exper. & Realism (Aristotelian Soc. Suppl., > Vol. IX) 163 > > The propositions which represent this ultimate connexion of terms I call, > after B. Russell, atomic propositions. > > 1933 Mind XLII. 38 > > Similar to the species of geometry, we might have in logic â?~a logic of atomic > propositionsâ?T and â?~a logic of molecular propositionsâ?T. > > 1948 B. RUSSELL Human Knowl. II. ix. 145 We give the name â?~atomic sentenceâ?T > to one not containing logical words. > > 1956 G. RYLE in Ayer et al. Revol. Philos. 10 > > The analysis of compound propositions into their simple elements, the > conjunctionless or â?~atomicâ?T propositions. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html