[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: proposal for a test harness
- From: Christian Egli <christian.egli@xxxxxx>
- To: Mesar Hameed <mesar.hameed@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:58:28 +0100
Hi Mesar
Mesar Hameed <mesar.hameed@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> All the options you gave yesterday and your example today is far more verbose
> than my implementation.
Yes I agree with you. What I (really) like about the doctests is that
they are a standard and there is literally no support code involved.
> If we cant agree on something workable I am happy to drop the request, and
> deal with things locally as
> best as I can.
Oh, common. Please let's not play that game. I really want your test
harness and your contributions. At the same time I like the doctests.
What I'm going to do now is to integrate both your stuff and the
doctests into the build system so they are both invoked when doing a
`make check`. That way a writer of tests can decide which way she likes
better and use that.
Hope that is a workable solution.
Thanks
Christian
--
Christian Egli
Swiss Library for the Blind, Visually Impaired and Print Disabled
Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland
-----
Jetzt kostenlos eidgenoessische und kantonale Abstimmungsunterlagen aus 17
Kantonen
zum Hoeren auf CD abonnieren: medienverlag@xxxxxx
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Other related posts:
