[LRflex] Re: Thunderstorm last night

  • From: "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 06:42:48 -0700

Thanks Richard.  I found the setting and have disabled it.  I was in Zion a few 
falls ago and was experimenting with moonlight and star trails and was waiting 
15 minutes for the camera to "recover".  I knew about the dark frame thing, but 
it just never sunk in as to what it was doing.  Same thing two nights ago.  It 
finally clicked.  Waiting for another thunder storm....

Aram


From: Richard Ward 
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:37 PM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Thunderstorm last night


Hi Aram!
   Great and Very Dangerous Photograph! Mega Kudo's.  I would like to now point 
you toward the topic of "Dark Frame Image Subtraction". This is what is almost 
certainly what was slowing your image writes down so much. Canon offers what 
they call "Long Exposure Noise Reduction" and it is (in my experience) easily 
turned off in your cameras custom function settings. What the 'Noise Reduction" 
is trying to do is prevent an occasional issue digital images sensors have when 
the shutter speeds increase where pixels get stuck on or give a repeated false 
signal and 'muck' up a photographer's image. What happens is, in your case, for 
every 5 second of 'image' you shot, the camera took a 5 second image with the 
shutter closed, and subtracts any pixels that aren't black from the 'real' 5 
second image you shot. This computer processing takes a bit and add in the 
'write' time to record the final image and Voila! your 5 second shot has become 
a 10-15sec wait before you can shoot again.

I usually turn it Long Exposure Noise Reduction off in the custom functions 
area of my 20D. I prefer the extra responsiveness it gives, but it does add to 
my post production work. I was experimenting  with multi minute star trails 
landscapes and I;d be standing there freezing in the dark waiting forever for 
the blinking to stop!

You might want to see if your version of Canon Software includes a way to 
'automatically' do this during downloads or raw processing. I've heard current 
Adobe Lightroom products can do this as well, but haven't ever encountered it 
personally and can't comment on it's effectiveness (same for the canon 
software).

Richard


________________________________


Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.
~•~
"You miss 100% of the shots you never take" Wayne Gretzky 
~•~
In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows or Gates?
~•~ 
It's okay to be stupid. Just don't be gung-ho about it.
________________________________ 





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Aram Langhans <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 3:31:26 PM
Subject: [LRflex] Thunderstorm last night


We had a small thunderstorm roll through at dusk yesterday.  I have never seen 
lightning at this time of the day, where there was still some color in the sky 
and clouds, so I thought I'd give it a try.  I shot 50 frames and only caught 
lightning on two of them.  Had the camera (Rebel XTi) set on sequential 
exposure, and the shutter at 5 or 8 seconds, and the cable release clicked on 
so I did not have to stand there.  It would fire one shot, then write it to 
disk then fire the next shot.  Last time I did this was with my R8 and motor 
winder and it worked well.  Problem with the digital Rebel is that after each 5 
second exposure it took about 10 seconds to write the info to the card before 
it took the next shot.  So, I missed about 66% of the time.  And, every time I 
saw a great bolt, I looked over to the camera and it was still writing the 
previous exposure.  Drats.  Maybe a 50 D would write faster?  I think it has 
something to do with the null exposure when using long shutter speeds.  Maybe I 
could turn that off if I looked at the manual.
 
did catch this one, however.  
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/misc/-7.jpg.html  

 
comments and criticism welcome.

Aram

Other related posts: