[LRflex] Re: R lenses on Nikon
- From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@xxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:28:23 -0700
On Feb 5, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Aram Langhans wrote:
You are probably right, Steve, but I think I will hang in there a
bit longer just to see what the R10 actually flushes out to be. I
will putter along with my Canon, which is even more of a PITA than
the Nikon would be due to the exposure problems. Most of what I
shoot is static so I can take my time (as much as my wife can stand)
and go through the ritual. If I need faster performance, I just put
on my Sigma 17-70 which is really a pretty good performer for what
it cost. It was a great deal better than the POC lens that came
with the camera, or even the USM Canon lenses according what I have
read. I am sure L glass is better, but that was not my purpose in
buying the camera.
I understand... I'm hoping for the best,
wonder when the R10 will arrive,
Steve
Aram
> -----Original Message-----
> From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leicareflex-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Barbour
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:00 AM
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: R lenses on Nikon
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Frank Filippone wrote:
>
> the R10 if/when ever available will be expensive......too much for
me,
>
> I do have R lenses...so along with Nikkor glass, the D700 is the
best
> realistic option,
>
> many thanks Frank,
>
> Steve
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.18/1936 - Release Date:
2/5/2009 11:34 AM
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
