[LRflex] Re: One for the light or lack of it
- From: Richard Ward <ilovaussiesheps@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Hi Walter,
your images don't seem glum to me at all. They are quite strong images on
the sharpness, visual contrasts, and varied areas of focus, fronts. The places
and items in the scenes can have some gloomy associations, that's for sure, but
I think you've accomplished some rich image making, that have been quite a
pleasure to experience and I am grateful to have seen them. Sincere Kudo's from
Michigan. I will say that I'm of a mind there may be a fair bit to be gained if
you were to explore some narrower cropping for the images I've seen in your
'cemetary series' - if I may call it that.
Sincerely
Richard Ward
________________________________
It's okay to be stupid just don't be gung-ho about it.
________________________________
________________________________
From: Walter Kramer <walter.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 2:52:57 AM
Subject: [LRflex] One for the light or lack of it
I hope people are not yet tired of my glum shots. here is one I like.
It is 'under exposed' but seems to work on my monitor.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/25126059@N02/4306174528/sizes/l/
--
Walter Krämer
walter.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
walter.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bus: 03 9854 2463
Mob: 0414 884 965
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
