[LRFlex] Re: Farkle

  • From: "andy Wagner" <yxandy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:34:15 -0500

Thanks for the idea Doug
I'll see if that works for getting an R9. I can't convince the wife that I'll need it for the digital back. Mabe this will work ;-) But I'm not holding my breath.


From: Doug Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [LRFlex] Re: Farkle
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:47:51 -0700

on 6/21/04 5:15 AM, Gary E at ge_crocus@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I can't deal with letting my SL go for months
> to get some Farkle applied...

This is how you rationalize getting another SL.  The camera's going to be
away for some months getting farkelized, so you gotta have another.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/



-----------------  >--
Regards
Andy

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Movies - Trailers, showtimes, DVD's, and the latest news from Hollywood! http://movies.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200509ave/direct/01/

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
   www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. leicareflex
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2004