Re: Which would be your choice?
- From: "R. Clayton McKee" <leica@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 23:06:45 -0500
Quoth the David Young :
> I need to submit one photo of barrel racing, to the Picture BC
> people...
> Which would be your choice? And why?
Gotta be #3.
1 is good on the horse but I can't see the rider's face and for me
that kills it.
2 is also good on the horse but the rider's posture is so out of
whack I can't imagine she did well, and it destroys the impact of the
photo - she's not working with the horse, she's going against it.
3 is all that's left. You clipped the horse's tail a little and it
could use a little less DOF, for my money, just to make it pop, but
it's still a very nice shot and definitely the class entry of this
set.
Unless, of course, I'm wrong. Which has never happened before.
Ever. Really.
--
R. Clayton McKee http://www.rcmckee.com
Photojournalist rcmckee@xxxxxxxxxxx
P O Box 571900 voice/fax 713/783-3502
Houston, TX 77257-1900 cell phone # on request
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- References:
- Which would be your choice?
- From: David Young
Other related posts:
- » Which would be your choice?
- » Re: Which would be your choice?
- » Re: Which would be your choice?
- » Re: Which would be your choice?
- Which would be your choice?
- From: David Young