RE: newer winamp and jaws?

  • From: "Matthew Horspool" <drjaws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:01:57 +0100

I use winamp 5.05 with the Classic skin and it works fine for me

-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of richard brooksand Kim Kelly
Sent: 21 September 2004 11:00
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: newer winamp and jaws?


I am now using winamp 2.95, and, it seems to work prety well with jaws 
5.  Would there be any advantage to upgrading winamp, and if so: what 
version would be the best?? I would appreciate input as I don't want to
get 
into a worse situation like I've done before by upgrading.

Richard Brooks Vice President Camp Ability INC
and mate
Kim Kelly.
We enable the disabled, not disable them further.



-- 
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.271 / Virus Database: 264.9.3 - Release Date: 9/17/2004


--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: