Re: jaws 12 Dec Talk access 32
- From: "ptusing" <ptusing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:35:19 -0400
Hi,
Thanks Daniel fort hat post.
I am not trying to beat a dead horse.
However, we have no experience at all with how blind people will deal with
screen readers when we reachthe age of 70's.
No one is discussingthis or planning forthis.
sighted people can buy stronger bifocalsa ndthey are fine.
Thesense we must use requires we can destinctly hear the spoken word and we
need the best optionsavailable.
Oeriginally, my first question was if there was a voice that has the
intonation--which I need--and th clarity of Access 32 andthe speed.
I asked people to write me off list.
I work with numbers so I need intonation sothe numbers do not soundall
alike and to sustain the intensity of listeningto nonstop numbers!
I seek any answer.
When I am 75, I want to support F S and still use JAWS and not as friends
with hearing impairmennt have had to do --e. g.
change to the other screen reader.
This issue is nothing less than accomodating to disability.
AndI do prefer JAWS.
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
Alternative archives located at:
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
