RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- From: "MarkF" <mfurness@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:11:49 -0400
The answer is simple.
You always start with the first number after a period.
If you want anaxample, download both versions an use windows explorer
[MarkF says:] and see which one comes first. That is, if your explorer is
set up to list in alphabetical order.
Mark -----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Allan Wong
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:48 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
hi,
you are absolutely wrong! read this numbering carefully,
the previously release is J9.0.552 which is 552 and the currently release is
J9.0.2152 which is 2152. so how you tell a number 2 is before 5? and how you
calculate 552 after 2152?
_____
Warmest Regards,
Allan Wong <mailto:allan.wkf@xxxxxxxxx>
From: MarkF <mailto:mfurness@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 02:58
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: freedom scientific weird numerical system
Is it just me and all the people I have talked to.
numerically speaking jaws 9.00.522 should be the latest update NOT
9.00.2152
This is not the way versions numbers should be labeled
.2 comes before .5.
Has anyone else thought this strange?
Mark
The beginning of strife is [like] letting out water, So abandon the quarrel
before it breaks out.
- Follow-Ups:
- Admin: RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- From: James Homuth
- References:
- Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- From: Allan Wong
Other related posts:
- » freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- » Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- Admin: RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- From: James Homuth
- Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- From: Allan Wong