RE: Unknown Function Call To ismagicrunning
- From: "Jim Grimsby JR." <jimgrims@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:46:05 -0800
Hi bruce ys infact these files should be there in the personal folder if
you infact have edited them. Now see my other method on another approach to
editing the default file. But under stand if you are going to edit your
default files when you update you may need to remove them and start over. I
think we should all right to fs and give them the other alternative I gave
in my last message. This will avoid this problem for ever more.
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Bruce Toews
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 12:07 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Unknown Function Call To ismagicrunning
It's a fair question, Chris, but consider. Your user directory should not
be the place where these default configuration files are located. What
needs to be fixed is whatever sequence of events caused those files to be
there in the first place. It's like expecting a boat engine to
automatically shut-down as a failsafe if it is run in the middle of the
Sahara.
Bruce
--
Bruce Toews
Skype ID: o.canada
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: DogRiver@xxxxxxxx
LiveJournal: http://brucetola.livejournal.com
Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Chris Skarstad wrote:
> Yes, it would appear that my little problem wasn't so isolated after all.
> But here's my question, and it may get me in trouble, but oh well.
Shouldn't
> that bug have been squashed during the beta cycle? I mean, with as many
> people as I've seen have that particular issue, you would certainly think
> that FS would take steps so that type of thing doesn't happen, or if users
> reported it happening, they should've fixed it. Maybe my standards are
too
> high, but I find it unacceptable that we should have to delete any files
or
> make any modifications like that just so our screenreader, one of the most
> important pieces of software we use, should work without any kind of error
> messages all over the place. If you're a farely new computer user, or if
you
> just don't know what to do, how can you be expected to know how to delete
> those 2 files like we did? Sure that's where tech support comes in, but
what
> if you write to them and they don't contact you?
> you would receive all kinds of error messages and not know how to fix
them.
>
>
> i fully realize that every system is different, and I fully understand
that
> it's not easy for FS to squash bugs on absolutely every system out there.
> But if it's a wide spread problem, I would like to see them take care of
it.
> In fact, I would really like to see a maintanance release that fixes all
> kinds of long-standing issues I.e. the loads of empty virtual buffers
people
> are seing, the issue with the s key not going to the same link on a web
page,
> the other focus issues that happen from time to time, stuff like that.
Yes,
> having new features is a nice thing, but what good are those features if
the
> screenreader you're using isn't as reliable as it could be? At this
point, i
> want a screenreader that just works and I don't need all the toys.
> Just something to ponder.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 12:46 AM 3/3/2007, you wrote:
>> Thanks, Chris, your clear and concise steps worked like well, shall I
say,
>> "magic."
>> Let me tell you, it was a real joy eliminating that pesky little nuisance
>> so great post; thanks again!
>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 2091 (20070303) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> <http://www.eset.com>http://www.eset.com
>
> --
> JFW related links:
> JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
> Scripting mailing list:
> http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
> JFW List instructions:
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the
> way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact
the
> list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.5/707 - Release Date: 3/1/2007
2:43 PM
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
