Re: Preview of JAWS 12
- From: "Zdenek Vopat" <zdenekvopat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:03:01 +0200
Hello wwhat are their functionaliisty that jaws does not have?
Many thanks.
Zdenek
----- Original Message -----
From: "chris hallsworth" <christopherh40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: Preview of JAWS 12
> Hi all,
> not to bash JAWS but there are others out there. Whether they're
> "better" is for one's personal likings. I personally like JAWS, but
> prefer NVDA and also like Window-Eyes and System Access. But that's me
> and this is by no means in a particular order.
> Hope this helps.
>
>
> Signed by Chris Hallsworth
> E-mail and Facebook: christopherh40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> MSN: ch9675@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Skype: chrishallsworth7266
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/christopherh40
> Klango: chrishallsworth
> If you have any computer problems or queries, please do not hesitate to
> contact me on the above channels. Many thanks.
>
> On 04/08/2010 20:47, Zdenek Vopat wrote:
>> hello everyone:
>> do you think that there is a better screan reading software than jaws?
>> Just curious.
>> Zdenek
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Alan Clendinen
>> To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 4:14 PM
>> Subject: re: Preview of JAWS 12
>>
>>
>> Cy,
>>
>> I used to work for an Apple dealership, and was a die-hard promoter of
>> the Macintosh. After losing my eyesight in 91, I went back to college to
>> become a software engineer. Needless to say, all the classes required use of
>> an MS Windows operating system, because there were far more options for
>> compilers and programming tools written for Windows.
>>
>> That's where I first began using JAWS for Windows and JAWS for DOS.
>>
>> The built-in screen-reader app for Macs is probably better than the old
>> OutSpoken, but it's not fair to compare a screen-reader produced 20 years
>> ago with a screen-reader written today. I will say, however, that from what
>> I've seen, JFW 11 is a much more capable and versatile screen-reader than
>> the one Apple offers. This is probably due to the fact that JAWS has to make
>> constant improvements in order to compete in the marketplace, while Apple's
>> screen-reader has no competition.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> Cy wrote:
>> Alan,
>> I also used Outspoken in the early 90s.
>>
>> You are almost correct, Outspoken made the Mac *almost* useable.
>> (LOLLOLLOL)
>>
>> Compared to what we have today it was very basic to say the least.
>>
>> That is actually why I migrated to the DOS/Windows machines. I believe the
>> first speech software I used on a DOS machine was Artic and used a
>> Symphonics 215 speech board. It was also pretty limited but better than
>> Outspoken.
>>
>> I wish I had the guts to just switch back to a Mac and leave all this W7,
>> JAWS 11 and so on behind. (LOL)
>>
>> Cy, The Anasazi.
>>
> --
> JFW related links:
> JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
> Scripting mailing list:
> http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
> JFW List instructions:
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> Alternative archives located at:
> http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
> way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
> list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx$U«zVyÙb?K hh?êZ?èm¶?ÿÃ
> ç?¢k ?éí?ø?r?¿IÊâ¦Ø§?f¢?)à?+-?Ûiÿùb²Û-?èÝ?Ê&þX¬¶)ß¡È"þÇ+??h?¶©?+az7ar??bâ²Ø§²Úîrب?Äè¦?-jg¬±¨ ¶?azX¬¶Ç§v+m¢7ð~·??+-²?àN?§²æìr¸?yúè?Øb²f¢?)à?+-±éÝjg¬±¨ ¶?ß·ª¹ë-~·??+-²?àÂ+a¶°¢·n?Ë?±Êâm觶¬¹¸ÞrÙb?à+r¯zÉhq«^u«a¶Úÿ
> 0~·??+-²?àýªÜ?+Þ³øßÀ
> mz¹Ú¶+Þj·!?÷¬??µçZ¶m§ÿçÚv?nW?¢oÉd?¢µ¢?Ú0±ýµã?»öf??ò¢èZ½æ§ÉÊ'qê籦èºÛazX¬¶?,¶·?z+Þuúè?Ø^?+-¢»a{²¶¥?Ëb±·¢?
î?Ú'¢Úh²Ûazkh¶¥?ËQjØ^Ê'µ§-¶¥?ËhÂw«jØßÁ§f?{ ç¥?Ël¢¸
Other related posts:
