RE: JFW authorization issue[A
- From: "Lucia Greco" <lucy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:26:27 -0800
If this is the case . Are they not then invading our personal
information. I don't like the sound of that=20
Lucia Greco
Access Technology Specialist
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On =
Behalf
Of philwh@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 4:36 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: JFW authorization issue=1B[A
but, here is the major difference between microsoft and freedom. you can
change several components in a pc such as adding a hard drive, changing =
the
video card or sound card, and microsoft doesn't require reactivation.
freedom requires it with the smallest change. I had to do it when I had =
to
replace my floppy drive. phil
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 05:24:22PM -0600, Chris Skarstad wrote:
> HI
>=20
> The proper term here is authorization, not verification. Either way,=20
> Microsoft Corporation also requires you to re-activate windows if any=20
> major changes are made, so the statement that no other company or=20
> software program requires you to re-activate, verify or whatever you=20
> like to call it is false. I'm not saying that this is right and I'm=20
> not saying I agree with it. It is just the way things are now. So if=20
> you're going to use Freedom Scientific, or Microsoft products, it's=20
> just something you're going to have to deal with. Sorry to be the one =
> to tel you folks this, but it's true. YOu do have choices after all,=20
> there is Linix to use if you so choose. I'll stick with windows =
though,
and I don't mind sending them this
> information if it helps things run properly. I've got nothing to =
hide.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> At 04:18 PM 3/27/2005, you wrote:
> >Thanks.
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "AB7HW Dick Lee Chrisman" <ab7hw@xxxxxxx>
> >To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 2:02 PM
> >Subject: Re: New features JFW 6.0. I Dislike the Verification Bug!
> >
> >
> >Hello Jerry
> > No Freedom Scientific says nothing specific=20
> >as to
> > what will indicate a need
> >to reVerify your JFW 6.0 and why it is necessary they only say that =
if
> >anything changes on YOUR COMPUTER it may require a Verification? =
This
annoy
> >me, in that this is my computer and no other company requires you to
report
> >adding a Hard Drive or even a new sound card, but worst of all if you
> >install a floppy Disc Drive you will have to reVerify your JFW =
program!
> >What does this have to do with the operation of JFW!
> >The Customer Service person that emailed me about this problem said =
that
my
> >Authorization Key count was at 3, of course it was I had written to =
have
my
> >count put back to three, which Freedom Scientific had done with in =
the 24
> >hour period, the Customer Service person wrote back 3 days after the
email I
> >emailed to their department, so of course the Key count was up to =
three!
> >So I don't have any answers just a lot of trouble with the =
Verification!
> >I do not plan to spend more money for a Dongle!
> >Dick Chrisman
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Jerry Neufeld" <jerry.neufeld@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 2:03 PM
> >Subject: Re: New features JFW 6.0 that I dislike
> >
> >
> > > Hello Dick.
> > >
> > > I was curious about FS's verification procedure. Do you happen to=20
> > > know what they consider a significcant change in the machine? And=20
> > > if they do come up with what they view a significant change, I=20
> > > assume they allow eloquence to tell you so? If I ask these=20
> > > questions, it is because one of my machines will
> > > no longer talk once the desktop comes up, or at least, I think =
it's
up. I
> > > will know tomorrow when an assistant confirms my hypothesis that =
it is
the
> > > new SoundBlaster audigy platinum that wants registering before it =
lets
me
> > > proceed.
> > >
> > > In any event, any info you have on this issue would be interesting =
> > > to a lot of us.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jerry
> > > jerry.neufeld@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "AB7HW Dick Lee Chrisman" <ab7hw@xxxxxxx>
> > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 3:50 PM
> > > Subject: New features JFW 6.0 that I dislike
> > >
> > >
> > >> One new feature that started with JFW 6.0 is the many times JFW=20
> > >> wants to perform a Verification! It seems like JFW 6.0 seems to=20
> > >> think I have made a change to MY COMPUTER and I under line MY=20
> > >> COMPUTER, I have had to have my Authorization Keys up dated 10=20
> > >> times or more so far! So I have to go out and have a email sent=20
> > >> to Freedom Scientific to request
> > >> new Keys, in 24 hours or so they do up date my number of Keys, =
but if
I
> > >> do
> > >> not do this in time I will be running in Demo Mode while being a
Legal
> > >> paid
> > >> up JFW user with additional SMA's paid for!
> > >> Freedom Scientific does not argue about providing new Keys, to =
their
> > >> credit!
> > >> I wrote Freedom Scientific and ask about, but of course they have
never
> > >> heard of this complaint or problem?
> > >> Today I rebooted or should I say shut off the computer and =
restarted
and
> > >> both times it ask for a new Verification and of course removed =
one
Key
> > >> for
> > >> each occurrence, Poop!
> > >> I hope Freedom Scientific finds this to be as big of a Pain to =
them
as it
> > >> is
> > >> for me and fixes this problem!
> > >> I don't think their new way of Verifying users is well thought =
out,
so
> > >> that
> > >> is my only complaint on the new JFW 6.0!
> > >> I look forward to their correcting this dilemma!
> > >> Dick Chrisman
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To=20
> > >> unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to=20
> > >> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the=20
> > >> subject line. Archives located at:=20
> > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > >>
> > >> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the=20
> > >> list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the=20
> > >> list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > --
> > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To=20
> > > unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to=20
> > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject =
> > > line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > >
> > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the=20
> > > list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the=20
> > > list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >--
> >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To=20
> >unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to=20
> >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject=20
> >line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >
> >If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, =
> >or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list.=20
> >Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.3 - Release Date: 3/25/2005
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.3 - Release Date: 3/25/2005
> >
> >--
> >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To=20
> >unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to=20
> >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject=20
> >line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >
> >If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, =
> >or
> >the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather=20
> >contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> --
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To=20
> unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to=20
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject=20
> line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>=20
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list,=20
> or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather =
> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or =
the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact =
the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
